Neither we nor our allies are prepared to fight all-out war with Russia, regionally or globally.

President Biden Delivers Remarks On Gas Prices

An image of Russian President Vladimir Putin is displayed as U.S. President Joe Biden speaks about gas prices in the South Court Auditorium at the White House campus on June 22, 2022. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images) 


January 26, 2023

Until it decided to confront Moscow with an existential military threat in Ukraine, Washington confined the use of American military powerto conflicts that Americans could afford to lose, wars with weak opponents in the developing world from Saigon to Baghdad that did not present an existential threat to U.S. forces or American territory. This time—a proxy war with Russia—is different. 

Contrary to early Beltway hopes and expectations, Russia neither collapsed internally nor capitulated to the collective West’s demands for regime change in Moscow. Washington underestimated Russia’s societal cohesion, its latent military potential, and its relative immunity to Western economic sanctions. 


As a result, Washington’s proxy war against Russia is failing. U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin was unusually candid about the situation in Ukraine when he told the allies in Germany at Ramstein Air Base on January 20, “We have a window of opportunity here, between now and the spring,” admitting, “That’s not a long time.” 

Alexei Arestovich, President Zelensky’s recently fired advisor and unofficial “Spinmeister,” was more direct. He expressed his own doubts that Ukraine can win its war with Russia and he now questions whether Ukraine will even survive the war. Ukrainian lossesat least 150,000 dead including 35,000 missing in action and presumed dead—have fatally weakened Ukrainian forces resulting in a fragile Ukrainian defensive posture that will likely shatter under the crushing weight of attacking Russian forces in the next few weeks. 

Ukraine’s materiel losses are equally severe. These include thousands of tanks and armored infantry fighting vehicles, artillery systems, air defense platforms, and weapons of all calibers. These totals include the equivalent of seven years of Javelin missile production. In a setting where Russian artillery systems can fire nearly 60,000 rounds of all types—rockets, missiles, drones, and hard-shell ammunition—a day, Ukrainian forces are hard-pressed to answer these Russian salvos with 6,000 rounds daily. New platform and ammunition packages for Ukraine may enrich the Washington community, but they cannot change these conditions.

Predictably, Washington’s frustration with the collective West’s failure to stem the tide of Ukrainian defeat is growing. In fact, the frustration is rapidly giving way to desperation. 

Michael Rubin, a former Bush appointee and avid supporter of America’s permanent conflicts in the Middle East and Afghanistan, vented his frustration in a 1945 article asserting that, “if the world allows Russia to remain a unitary state, and if it allows Putinismto survive Putin, then, Ukraine should be allowed to maintain its own nuclear deterrence, whether it joins NATO or not.” On its face, the suggestion is reckless, but the statement does accurately reflect the anxiety in Washington circles that Ukrainian defeat is inevitable.


NATO’s members were never strongly united behind Washington’s crusade to fatally weaken Russia. The governments of Hungary and Croatia are simply acknowledging the wider European public’s opposition to war with Russia and lack of support for Washington’s desire to postpone Ukraine’s foreseeable defeat. 

Though sympathetic to the Ukrainian people, Berlin did not supportall-out war with Russia on Ukraine’s behalf. Now, Germans are also uneasy with the catastrophic condition of the German armed forces. 

Retired German Air Force General (four-star equivalent) Harald Kujat, former chairman of the NATO Military Committee, severely criticized Berlin for allowing Washington to railroad Germany into conflict with Russia, noting that several decades of German political leaders actively disarmed Germany and thus deprived Berlin of authority or credibility in Europe. Though actively suppressed by the German government and media, his comments are resonating strongly with the German electorate.

The blunt fact is that in its efforts to secure victory in its proxy war with Russia, Washington ignores historical reality. From the 13th century onward, Ukraine was a region dominated by larger, more powerful national powers, whether Lithuanian, Polish, Swedish, Austrian, or Russian. 

In the aftermath of the First World War, abortive Polish designs for an independent Ukrainian State were conceived to weaken Bolshevik Russia. Today, Russia is not communist, nor does Moscow seek the destruction of the Polish State as Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, and their followers did in 1920. 

So where is Washington headed with its proxy war against Russia? The question deserves an answer.

On Sunday December 7, 1941, U.S. Ambassador Averell Harriman was with Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill having dinner at Churchill’s home when the BBC broadcast the news that the Japanese had attacked the U.S. Naval Base at Pearl Harbor. Harriman was visibly shocked. He simply repeated the words, “The Japanese have raided Pearl Harbor.”

Subscribe Today

Get weekly emails in your inbox

Email Address:

Harriman need not have been surprised. The Roosevelt administration had practically done everything in its power to goad Tokyo into attacking U.S. forces in the Pacific with a series of hostile policy decisions culminating in Washington’s oil embargo during the summer of 1941. 

In the Second World War, Washington was lucky with timing and allies. This time it’s different. Washington and its NATO allies are advocating a full-blown war against Russia, the devastation and breakup of the Russian Federation, as well as the destruction of millions of lives in Russia and Ukraine. 

Washington emotes. Washington does not think, and it is also overtly hostile to empiricism and truth. Neither we nor our allies are prepared to fight all-out war with Russia, regionally or globally. The point is, if war breaks out between Russia and the United States, Americans should not be surprised. The Biden administration and its bipartisan supporters in Washington are doing all they possibly can to make it happen.  



Douglas Macgregor

Douglas Macgregor, Col. (ret.) is a senior fellow with The American Conservative, the former advisor to the Secretary of Defense in the Trump administration, a decorated combat veteran, and the author of five books.

Articles by Douglas trending_flat

Le « système » algérien étouffe l’Algérie. Entretien avec Xavier Driencourt

21 MARS 2023 par XAVIER DRIENCOURT. REVUE  » CONFLITS » Diplomate, ambassadeur à deux reprises à Alger, Xavier Driencourt est un fin observateur de la société algérienne. De la terreur de la guerre civile dans les années 1990 aux espoirs déçus du Hirak, retour sur un pays à la dérive.  Xavier Driencourt, diplomate, a été ambassadeur de…

« Pékin/Moscou. Xi Jinping en Russie ». L’édito de Charles SANNAT

par Charles Sannat – 21 Mar 2023 Xi Jinping le président chinois est en visite d’état pour trois jours à Moscou ou il va pouvoir s’entretenir longuement avec le président russe Vladimir Poutine. Les Chinois sont toujours très diplomates et permettent toujours aux « adversaires » de garder la face. Aussi, ce voyage selon les mots de Xi est un…

OID: Lettre d’information du 21 mars 2023

L’Observatoire de l’immigration et de la démographie (OID) est une structure d’étude et d’information relative aux évolutions migratoires et démographiques, destinée aux décideurs ainsi qu’à l’ensemble des citoyens intéressés par ce sujet.Nous apportons une vision rationnelle et dépassionnée au débat public, en puisant aux meilleures sources disponibles : statistiques publiques, travaux de chercheurs spécialisés, analyses juridiques.Votre point…

Biden’s looming trap in Ukraine

UKRAINE WAR Three key factors show why the administration needs to press the accelerator pedal on negotiations with Russia now. MARCH 20, 2023 Written by George Beebe RESPONSIBLE STATECRAFT Three big factors are in motion that will shape prospects for the war in Ukraine. Each of these affects the others in potentially reinforcing ways. Together, they…

Retraites : un référendum ?

Retraites : un référendum pour donner la parole au peuple, signez l’appel de « Marianne » Démocratie Par Marianne Publié le 17/03/2023 à 18:09 Powered byAudion Ecouter cet article Retraites : un référendum pour donner la parole au peuple, signez l’appel de « Marianne » 00:00 En usant du 49.3 pour faire passer sa réforme des retraites, Élisabeth Borne a empêché la…

La Bundeswehr « manque de tout et l’Armée française « n’a qu’un peu de tout »

Mar 20, 2023 Geopragma Billet du Lundi rédigé par le Général (2s) Jean-Bernard Pinatel, vice-président de Géopragma.      Le journal le Monde du 16 mars 2023 a consacré un article à l’armée allemande intitulé « l’accablant état des lieux de la Bundeswehr », et un interview du délégué général à l’armement pour l’armée française. C’est l’occasion d’analyser  les capacités…

Livraison d’avions de chasse à l’Ukraine : l’engrenage fatal ?

Frédéric Lassez 19 mars 2023 BOULEVARD VOLTAIRE Imprimer, enregistrer en PDF ou envoyer cet article Après les chars, c’est désormais au tour des avions de chasse. La Pologne, qui se veut le leader d’une Europe atlantiste désinhibée, a annoncé, jeudi dernier, qu’elle livrerait prochainement un premier lot de quatre MiG-29 à Kiev. La Slovaquie a suivi le mouvement dès…

Votre commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:


Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Déconnexion /  Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Connexion à %s

%d blogueurs aiment cette page :